Scientists, Mission Managers in Attendance:
Lisa Frattere, STScI
Rob Landis, JSC
Steve Pompea, NOAO
Brian Abbott, AMNH
Randy Landsberg, Univ. Chicago
Michael Sims, Ames
Robert Hurt, Spitzer
Quick acess to raw data from many projects
Raw data servers (Cassini, MER)
Press release arhives
Paritview
FITS Liberator
SDSS Sky server
NVO
Bandwidth, graphics cards, computer access, all are increasing greatly
Large datasets,
Example: orbital elements are available for cassini, but how do people access them?
Accessing to data; awareness of existence of datasets, easy and open access to data
Visualization tools
Rewards & recognition for scientists for pursuing public visualizations
Unified way to serve the dataÉ targeted repositories
Develop a bigger picture, stepping back from politics, funding, etc.
Increasing awareness within the community of the availability of resources
Intelligent tagging of image/animation resources with data to facilitate use by end users (location, objects, field of view, etc.)
Among scientists
Between diciplines
Vis Facilitators to help scientists understand how to visualize their data in useful way.
How do we inform museums of the resources we have available?
How do museums tell us what they need?
Agendas: each facility has its own bottom line: fuding, politics, selling product
ITAR limitations for data distribution
Proprietary information and giving access
Image use policies; remove barriers for use for commercial projects
Time and money, especially for larger projects
RL: Gulf between mission ops and outreach. Feelings of intimidation.
Need to improve communications between different fields of science.
Visualization doesnŐt bring rewards like publications do. DoesnŐt encourage participation.
Focus should be on userŐs needs so scientists arenŐt forcing materials that arenŐt needed by content producers.
How do scientists get feedback of what materials are needed by the audience?
A two-way conversation between scientists and producers could better help the content be developed to needs. What can better set up that communication?
Fig 1 lacks feedback lines. Inputs flow in one direction, but we need to look at getting feedback in both directions.
Conflict between bottom line needs at each levelÉ promoting individual products, finding paying audiences, etc.
Cooperation vs. competition; developing wide ideas vs.